Monday, November 7, 2016

Some updates to standard earthquake preparedness and response advice

A friend of mine sent me a link to an interesting LA Times article about some modifications to the classic �Drop, Cover, Hold On� earthquake response.  I recommend checking it out.  It makes some common sense suggestions such as updating the common advice to get under a table and hold on, to incorporate covering your head with your hand as you get to the table, which makes sense considering that you sometimes have to travel a bit to get to a safe spot and could be beaned in the head on your way.

This got me to thinking about the various ways in which our understanding of not only quake-resistant construction, but also quake precautions and quake response, has changed over the years.  We�ve certainly come a long way since the days that preparing for an earthquake involved live human sacrifices, but even in the last few decades, the official advice has evolved a bit.

For example, as I mention in my talks, when I was a kid in LA, we were taught to brace ourselves in a doorway during an earthquake; but this is a vestige of days long ago when many Southern California homes were adobe buildings with wooden door frames.  The adobe would collapse during large quakes and the door frames would still be standing, but modern buildings are much stronger and the door frames don�t really offer structural support advantages any more.  What�s more, in door frames that contain doors, you could get hit by the door, your fingers could get crushed, etc.

Here�s one that I have started mentioning in my talks relatively recently.  (Sorry to those who recently came to my talks; I really will cover some new material here.)  When you are in bed, if your bedroom has been set up correctly, it can be safer to stay in bed during a quake than getting out of bed to get to your predetermined safe spot.  It seems that people have been getting injured during earthquakes as they tried to get from their bed to their dining room table because they had to go through less predictable and potentially hazardous surroundings, such as random objects on the floor, perhaps whatever wasn�t stuck down flying through the air, your pet porcupine running around panicked in the hallway, etc.  If nothing can fall on you because you haven�t hung anything over your bed, your nearby bookcase is braced to the wall, you don�t have a loose heavy potted plant on top of that bookcase, and you don�t have top-heavy glass-bowl floor lamps ready to tip over and whack you in the face, then they say you may be safer on your big bumper car of a bed with your head protected by the pillow than running around on the floor.

What about if you want to check on your small children in the other room?  (I have heard that when my parents came to get me and my sister out of bed during the 1971 Sylmar quake, coming out of their bedroom, they were going uphill.)  I believe some official advice has been to make sure your kids are secure in their beds and to check on them after the quake.  My friend Larry Guillot�bless his heart, he tells it like it is�wrote in one of his occasional e-mail newsletters coincidentally also called �Quake Tips� that �Parents: you won't stay in bed, so be careful (crawl if necessary) when you go to your children's rooms - and keep them in bed until the shaking is over� and of course make sure that the route from your room to your kids� rooms is secure.  Still, it can actually be very difficult to get out of bed during violent shaking, even if you want to, so be forewarned!

One big change has been in the recommended length of time for which you have stored supplies.  Remember 72hours.org?  3 days was the recommendation years ago, but based on accumulated experience in various disasters like Hurricane Katrina, 7 days became the recommended period of self-sufficiency, and now some sources are recommending 2 weeks.  Nothing like a few real-world disasters to blow away any rosy expectations of how long it can take to re-establish basic services!

Having a landline corded phone for use in an extended power outage has been good quake preparedness advice for many years, but as landline services get phased out, that advice might be completely out of date in not the too far future.  Similarly, the advice to have an out-of-town contact whom people in your area can call if they can�t dial across town but can dial out of town is likely to become archaic as text messaging, social media, and who-knows-what-is-next (telepathy app??) take over the world.

And don't even get me started about the ill-conceived attempt to �change� the recommended advice from getting under something indoors to getting next to something (the so-called �Triangle of Life� urban legend).  The problems with this myth are already discussed in one of my first articles.

As for me, I have always encouraged the use of maze picture hooks to hang pictures on the wall, but as you can see in my previous blog post, I feel I can change that advice to include the use of Command picture hanging strips as an excellent alternative.

Now here�s a thought: what would I like to see changed in the official quake preparedness/response advice?  I think if you read my article a few months ago about situational awareness, you will not be surprised: I�d like to make sure people know that all of these things that we advise you to do when an earthquake hits are good advice in default situations, and that people MUST be aware of any unique safety hazards and take care of them before they do anything else.  The best example, as discussed into the ground in my article about unattended flames, is that if you have a candle burning, especially one that can fall over onto the rug or sofa, your number one, above-all-else priority before getting under something or finding the kids is to blow that thing out!  (...and watch for smoldering wicks.)  Otherwise, you may have a house fire, perhaps even with leaking gas, and that table you are under ain�t gonna do you much good.

Here�s one I�ll bet you didn�t think of.  Ever accidently scorch dried hot chile peppers in a frying pan?  You get tear gas; it can be extreme.  If I were cooking kung pao chicken and a quake hit, I would first turn off the flame, and hopefully have the good sense to dump the wok�s contents into the sink before diving under the table because otherwise I might be overcome by the fumes.  Think I�m kidding?  I accidentally burned arbol chili peppers in the kitchen of the home I lived in while a grad student, and not only was I wishing I could submerge my head and lungs in ice water, but the neighbor�s cat, who always hung out in our backyard by the window when I would cook, fled!

In the unlikely event that you had a tub of bleach next to a tub of ammonia, better stop them from sloshing into each other.  I know I�m stretching a bit here, but I just wanted to give you an idea of the kinds of unusual circumstances that might pre-empt the usual advice about what to do during a quake!

I would imagine that evolving technology will continue to change our basic advice on what to do before and after a quake.  For example, let�s all hope that it isn�t too long before the main question of �what should we do when a quake suddenly hits?� changes into the new question of �what should we do when our ubiquitous earthquake early warning systems tell us a quake will hit our location in 30 seconds?�  In the meantime, this is a worthwhile topic to monitor, which you can do pretty nicely...by following this blog!


>>Back to blog

Tuesday, August 9, 2016

Are Command Picture Hanging Strips as good as maze picture hooks for quake-proof picture hanging?

(Note for e-mail subscribers; rather than read this in the e-mail message, please click on the title and go to the actual blog article so that the embedded videos will work; they may be large blank spaces in your e-mail message)

(Videos may or may not play on iPads; this is a recurrent problem with blogger blogs and iOS.  Reading on a computer is recommended.  Google Chrome browser seems to be more reliable than Safari for these videos on a Mac.) 

Wall hooks are great for holding up pictures as long as gravity is free to do its job.  However, during earthquakes when the wall is shaking up and down, pictures have an annoying and sometimes destructive tendency to jump off of the hooks and come crashing down.  (Although amazingly, some of them stayed on their hooks during the great 1906 San Francisco earthquake.)  When it comes to preventing pictures from jumping off of their hooks, the gold standard is the �maze� pictures hooks that trap the wire in a zigzag slot.  I�ve written about these terrific but simple devices before.  However, the maze picture hooks have some disadvantages.  They still allow the picture to jump around a lot, potentially causing other problems (I tend to put dabs of quake putty at the lower corners to stabilize them).  Furthermore, these plastic hooks are so thick that they cause the picture to lean forward at an extreme angle, especially smaller pictures.  This is also somewhat ameliorated by the thick gobs of quake putty to push the lower corners away from the wall but then the whole picture is sticking out rather than being flush with the wall (see the example photos of some pictures in my home).  (However, the putty can leave shiny marks on matte flat wall paint.) [Update 1/21/18: I have switched to using small cut-out rectangles of clear "Gripeez" or other similar modern gripper pads; they are quite sticky but leave no residue and reduce the chances of any marks on the paint.] [Update 3/12/18: regarding the use of Gripeez to stabilize the bottom corners of pictures hanging on hooks, as mentioned above, some unexpected home repairs involving water damage have made me need to temporarily remove some of the framed pictures that I hung with maze hooks a few months ago, and I have found to my annoyance that the little squares of Gripeez that I had cut out and placed under the corners left the paint slightly shadowed, as if it was a little wet.  I was annoyed to see this because the whole point of using these things instead of quake putty was to avoid shiny marks on flat paint, so seeing these shaded areas isn't much better.  In my old home, which had a similar paint job, the Gripeez left the paint absolutely unaffected, so I guess different paints react differently.  I did notice that they are extremely sticky though, so very small squares should still be effective and might leave less noticeable marks.]

I�ve been experimenting recently with 3M's Command Picture Hanging Strips that are essentially a version of Velcro composed of two identical rows of interlocking plastic hooks, on those amazing now-you-stick-it-now-you-don�t adhesive strips that lose their adhesion when you pull the tab.  They are nice because the picture is flush against the wall rather than hanging out at the top (see example photos below of more pictures in my home).  They also have the advantage of not requiring any holes in the wall, a bonus for renters and for anyone who likes to keep their walls intact.  These are extremely strong and advertise that four pairs of large strips will hold up a 16 lb picture.  However, I presume this rating applies to vertical stability on stationary walls, so what would happen if the wall was shaking violently in an earthquake?

I finally did the experiment, just for you, lucky Quaketips Readers.  Because I don�t really have time to hang up pictures and sit around waiting for major earthquakes to strike, I attached pictures to a painted piece of drywall and simulated an earthquake using my low-tech-but-effective �armquake� technique; that is, holding the board in my arms and shaking it violently.  I shook it at a magnitude of 10 on the Matt Springer Scale.  (The Matt Springer Scale has only one value, 10, corresponding to shaking a new bottle of salad dressing before use.  In extreme cases, it can go to 11, but I didn�t want to sprain my elbow.)

The verdict?

I�m impressed.

First of all, here�s how the experiment was done.  I wanted to come as close as I could to the actual situation of a picture hung on my wall.  If these strips could fail, it could be where one half of the mutant Velcro meets its other half, or it could be where the whole assembly meets the picture or the wall.  Therefore, I actually went to the hardware store, bought a real piece of drywall, painted it with a primer coat and then the same flat interior wall paint that I have on the walls of my home.

The first thing to try was to nail a standard picture hook into the wall and put a relatively light picture with a wire on the hook, and...ARMQUAKE!  Watch the video and see what happens to all these pictures on hooks in an earthquake.  If the result surprises you, well... please read every other article in my blog, you need this!  (Click here for high resolution or if you can't see the video below.)